Home › Guides › Are food sensitivity tests worth it? Cost, reliability and what allergy societies say
Are food sensitivity tests worth it? Cost, reliability and what allergy societies say
Whether a test is worth it depends on why it is being ordered, which is a question for you and a clinician. What we can show is what the food sensitivity test costs, what it is backed by, and what it does not tell you (prices checked Oct 21, 2026).
| food sensitivity test | |
|---|---|
| Prices we track | $169–$520 (10 listings from 6 sellers) |
| Lowest open to the public | $169 at Genova Connect (Genova Diagnostics, direct) |
| Overall evidence level | Not validated (IgG panels) |
What the evidence says
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology concluded that food-specific IgG4 reflects exposure/tolerance rather than allergy or intolerance and that testing should not be performed for food-related complaints. The AAAAI/ACAAI 2014 food allergy practice parameter states that allergen-specific IgG and cytotoxicity assays are unproved and should not be used to evaluate food allergy, and that food-specific IgG/IgG4 is not recommended for diagnosing non-IgE-mediated food disorders. This rating applies to IgG panels and cytotoxicity assays (e.g. ALCAT); we have not reviewed MRT separately.
What guidelines, insurers and the lab say
- EAACI task force (2008): "food-specific IgG4 does not indicate (imminent) food allergy or intolerance, but rather a physiological response of the immune system after exposition to food components", and testing "should not be performed in case of food-related complaints".
- AAAAI/ACAAI practice parameter (2014): "Unproved tests, including allergen-specific IgG measurement, cytotoxicity assays, applied kinesiology, provocation neutralization, and hair analysis, should not be used for the evaluation of food allergy."
- Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2012): "The CSACI strongly discourages the practice of food-specific IgG testing for the purposes of identifying or predicting adverse reactions to food."
- One insurer's policy (Aetna CPB 0038): lists the ALCAT test, allergen-specific IgG testing and the mediator release test (MRT) as "experimental, investigational, or unproven".
What it does not tell you
- The CSACI says "positive test results for food-specific IgG are to be expected in normal, healthy adults and children", and warns that a person with a true IgE-mediated food allergy "may very well not have elevated levels of specific IgG to their particular allergen".
- These panels use different methods (IgG, ALCAT, MRT); the statements above are about IgG testing. For MRT, Aetna's policy says there are no published studies showing improved outcomes; that is one insurer's view, not a guideline.
- One randomised trial in irritable bowel syndrome (Atkinson 2004) reported a 10% greater reduction in symptom score with an IgG-based elimination diet than a sham diet; its authors wrote that the approach "is worthy of further biomedical research".
This page does not say whether anyone should take the test. Insurance and HSA/FSA rules are covered in insurance and HSA for lab tests.
Compare prices
Sources
- Stapel SO, et al. Testing for IgG4 against foods is not recommended as a diagnostic tool: EAACI Task Force Report. Allergy. 2008;63(7):793-796. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18489614/
- Sampson HA, et al. Food allergy: A practice parameter update—2014 (Summary Statements 34 and 38). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014. https://www.aaaai.org/Aaaai/media/MediaLibrary/PDF%20Documents/Practice%20and%20Parameters/Food-Allergy-A-Practice-Parameter-Update-2014.pdf
- Carr S, et al. CSACI position statement on the testing of food-specific IgG. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2012;8:12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3443017/
- Aetna. Clinical Policy Bulletin 0038: Allergy and Hypersensitivity. https://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/1_99/0038.html
- Atkinson W, Sheldon TA, Shaath N, Whorwell PJ. Food elimination based on IgG antibodies in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2004;53(10):1459-1464. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15361495/
Evidence summaries are those on our test pages; guideline quotes checked 2026-10-21. Prices update when we re-check sellers.
Informational only, not medical advice. See about & disclaimer.
Get price-drop alerts
A short email when a tracked test's lowest price changes, plus new tests and sellers as we add them. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
A short email when a tracked test's lowest price changes, plus new tests and sellers as we add them. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.